Was Jesus the Lamb of G-d

How could Jesus be the Lamb of G-d?

John 1:29. The next day John seeth Jesus coming unto him, and saith, Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world.

Leviticus 4:2. Speak unto the children of Israel, saying, If a soul shall sin through ignorance against any of the commandments of the Lord concerning things which ought not to be done, and shall do against any of them:
3. If the priest that is anointed do sin according to the sin of the people; then let him bring for his sin, which he hath sinned, a young bullock without blemish unto the Lord for a sin offering.
4. And he shall bring the bullock unto the door of the tabernacle of the congregation before the Lord; and shall lay his hand upon the bullock's head, and kill the bullock before the Lord.
5. And the priest that is anointed shall take of the bullock's blood, and bring it to the tabernacle of the congregation:
6. And the priest shall dip his finger in the blood, and sprinkle of the blood seven times before the Lord, before the vail of the sanctuary.
7. And the priest shall put some of the blood upon the horns of the altar of sweet incense before the Lord, which is in the tabernacle of the congregation; and shall pour all the blood of the bullock at the bottom of the altar of the burnt offering, which is at the door of the tabernacle of the congregation.

Leviticus 4:23. Or if his sin, wherein he hath sinned, come to his knowledge; he shall bring his offering, a kid of the goats, a male without blemish:
24. And he shall lay his hand upon the head of the goat, and kill it in the place where they kill the burnt offering before the Lord: it is a sin offering.

Leviticus 4:27. And if any one of the common people sin through ignorance, while he doeth somewhat against any of the commandments of the Lord concerning things which ought not to be done, and be guilty;
28. Or if his sin, which he hath sinned, come to his knowledge: then he shall bring his offering, a kid of the goats, a female without blemish, for his sin which he hath sinned.
29. And he shall lay his hand upon the head of the sin offering, and slay the sin offering in the place of the burnt offering.
30. And the priest shall take of the blood thereof with his finger, and put it upon the horns of the altar of burnt offering, and shall pour out all the blood thereof at the bottom of the altar.

In the above scriptures we learn that a sin offering has to be:
1) without blemish,
2) it has to be killed at the door to the tabernacle
3) an anointed priest (Levi) brings the blood into the tabernacle
4) the priest shall dip his finger in the blood, and sprinkle of the blood seven times before the Lord, before the vail of the sanctuary.
5) And the priest shall put some of the blood upon the horns of the altar of sweet incense before the Lord, which is in the tabernacle of the congregation; and shall pour all the blood of the bullock at the bottom of the altar of the burnt offering, which is at the door of the tabernacle of the congregation.

G-d’s requirements for a sin offering are quite exact and they change not. If Jesus was the Lamb of G-d who takes away the sins of the world as stated by the Greek writer of John and no where else in the bible, then Jesus would have to meet the above criteria.

Was Jesus without blemish? Christianity today almost speaks with pride concerning Jesus’ condition just before his death, how he was marred worst then any man, beaten, whipped and don’t forget the crow of thorns. Jesus at the time of his death was greatly blemished and thereby could not be a sin offering.

Was Jesus killed at the door of the tabernacle by a Levi priest? No! Jesus was killed on a hill outside of town by Roman soldiers.

Was the blood of Jesus sprinkled in the Tabernacle? No.

Even if G-d accepted human sin offerings, which He does not, Jesus failed to make even one of the criteria for sin offerings. G-d’s law is totally set up on personal accountability; the sinner is responsible for the sin, no one else. The whole concept of one man dying for the sins of all goes against the very law that it claims to be following.

Deauteronomy 24:16. The fathers shall not be put to death for the children, neither shall the children be put to death for the fathers: every man shall be put to death for his own sin.

2 Kings 14:6. But the children of the murderers he slew not: according unto that which is written in the book of the law of Moses, wherein the Lord commanded, saying, The fathers shall not be put to death for the children, nor the children be put to death for the fathers; but every man shall be put to death for his own sin.

Jeremiah 31:30. But every one shall die for his own iniquity: every man that eateth the sour grape, his teeth shall be set on edge.

Ezekiel 18:20. The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.

G-d’s Holy Scriptures plainly show that we are responsible for our own sins and as far as being a ransom for all sinners.

Psalms 49:7. None of them no man can by any means redeem his brother, nor give to God a ransom for him:

Why do you think that the Greek writers of John, writing a hundred years after the death of Jesus, tried to sell you on this whole false “Lamb of god” theory?

How could the apostles know this scripture? Or?

How could they know this Scripture Or were the apostles dump as stones?

John 20:9. For as yet they knew not the scripture, that he must rise
again from the dead.

Herein lays the dirty little secret, there is no scripture that he must rise again fro the dead! The only scriptures that Jesus or his apostles used were the original Hebrew Scriptures. These scripture are the ones the Greek Writers of the New Testament tampered with in order to justify some of their new doctrine. They called this tampered with version the Old Testament, however during the apostles life time the old testament as we know it was not yet written, as a matter of fact the New Testament was not written yet either. So herein lies the dirty little secret, there are no scriptures in the Hebrew text or for that matter the old testament, that claim that the Messiah dies and rises again, quite the opposite, the messiah is suppose to claim the throne of David then lead Israel out of captivity. So you see by dying, Jesus proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that he was not the messiah. Oh! By the way there are also no scriptures that say the messiah gets a second chance either. There is no second coming.

So why, do you think, the Greek writers felt compelled to include this false scripture, about a scripture that did not exist, in the gospel of John. Oh! By the way, John did not write this gospel, but I will get into that at a later date. The reason the Greeks added this scripture is because the apostles were acting as if Jesus died period end of the story. Let’s look at what they said:

In Matthew after they saw Jesus it says some doubted.

Matthew 28:17 And when they saw him, they worshipped him: but some doubted

In Mark when Mary told them that she had actually seen Jesus, the apostles did not believe her, When the others told them, neither did they believe them.

Mark16:11 And they, when they had heard that he was alive, and had been seen of her, believed not.
16:13 And they went and told it unto the residue: neither believed they them.

In Luke

Luke 24:11 And their words seemed to them as idle tales, and they believed them not.
24:12 Then arose Peter, and ran unto the sepulcher; and stooping down, he beheld the linen clothes laid by
Themselves, and departed, wondering in himself at that which was come to pass.
24:22 Yea, and certain woman also of our company made us astonished, which were early at the sepulcher;
24:23 And when they found not his body,…

Idle tales and they believed them not----Peter ran to the tomb and departed----Wondering in himself at that which was come to pass----Made us astonished----?

And my favorite is written in John:

John 20:24 But Thomas, one of the twelve, called Didymus, was not with them when Jesus came.
John 20:25 The other disciples therefore said unto him, We have seen the Lord, But he said unto them. Except I shall see In his hands the print of the nails, and put my finger into the print of the nails, and thrust my hand into his side,…. I will not believe

Thomas was so sure that Jesus was dead that he makes this strong statement: Except I shall see In his hands the print of the nails, and put my finger into the print of the nails, and thrust my hand into his side,…. I will not believe

It’s obvious that the alleged resurrection of Jesus came as a complete surprise to the apostles. Now you have ask yourself were the apostles dumb as stones or were the Greek writers trying to establish a doctrine that may not have happened. I say that because in all of the gospels the Greek writers have inserted scripture which states that Jesus taught them that he would rise again.

Matthew

12:39 But he answered and said unto them, An evil and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given to it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas:
12:40 For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.

16:21 From that time forth began Jesus to shew unto his disciples, how that he must go unto Jerusalem, and suffer many things of the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised again the third day.

17:22 And while they abode in Galilee, Jesus said unto them, The Son of man shall be betrayed into the hands of men:
17:23 And they shall kill him, and the third day he shall be raised again. And they were exceeding sorry.

20:19 And shall deliver him to the Gentiles to mock, and to scourge, and to crucify him: and the third day he shall rise again.

Mark

8:31 And he began to teach them, that the Son of man must suffer many things, and be rejected of the elders, and of the chief priests, and scribes, and be killed, and after three days rise again.

9:31 For he taught his disciples, and said unto them, The Son of man is delivered into the hands of men, and they shall kill him; and after that he is killed, he shall rise the third day.
9:32 But they understood not that saying, and were afraid to ask him.

10:33 Saying, Behold, we go up to Jerusalem; and the Son of man shall be delivered unto the chief priests, and unto the scribes; and they shall condemn him to death, and shall deliver him to the Gentiles:
10:34 And they shall mock him, and shall scourge him, and shall spit upon him, and shall kill him: and the third day he shall rise again

LUKE

9:22 Saying, The Son of man must suffer many things, and be rejected of the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be slain, and be raised the third day.

18:31 Then he took unto him the twelve, and said unto them, Behold, we go up to Jerusalem, and all things that are written by the prophets concerning the Son of man shall be accomplished.
18:32 For he shall be delivered unto the Gentiles, and shall be mocked, and spitefully entreated, and spitted on:
18:33 And they shall scourge him, and put him to death: and the third day he shall rise again.

24:6 He is not here, but is risen: remember how he spake unto you when he was yet in Galilee,
24:7 Saying, The Son of man must be delivered into the hands of sinful men, and be crucified, and the third day rise again.
24:8 And they remembered his words,
Were the apostles dumb as stones or just maybe Jesus did not teach them over and over that he would die and rise again. Judging by the way they acted they were never expecting Jesus to die much less rise again from the dead. Mary, Even prepared burial spices and brought them to the tomb.

Remember the gospels were written after all the apostles were dead.

Again I have to ask, how could they know a scripture that did not exist?

Did Jesus Lie? or?

Or Did the Greek writers, writing many years after his death, try to establish a doctrine that might not have happened? Jesus said, according to the Greek writers:

Mathew 12:40. For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.

Three full days and three full nights! Now let’s look at the actual time line:

It has been generally accepted that Jesus was crucified around 3 on Friday afternoon and died shortly afterwards.

Matthew 27: 57. When the even was come, there came a rich man of Arimathaea, named Joseph, who also himself was Jesus' disciple:
58. He went to Pilate, and begged the body of Jesus. Then Pilate commanded the body to be delivered.
59. And when Joseph had taken the body, he wrapped it in a clean linen cloth,
60. And laid it in his own new tomb, which he had hewn out in the rock: and he rolled a great stone to the door of the sepulchre, and departed.

Jesus was laid in his tomb Friday evening. Now let’s do the math: The Passover runs from Dark on Friday till dark on Saturday that equals = One Night and One Day. Now we know that Mary came to the tomb early in the morning after the Sabbath:

Matthew 28; 1. In the end of the sabbath, as it began to dawn toward the first day of the week, came Mary Magdalene and the other Mary to see the sepulchre.

That equals = Another full Night bringing the grand total to Two full night (Friday & Saturday Nights) add to that One full day (Saturday) and you have the grand total of 2 nights and 1 day. This is a far cry from the 3 day and the 3 nights that Jesus promised!

Matthew 12: 40. For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.

Now it's quite obvious that somebody is lying, but who?

We Sin and G-d Punishes Himself?

Words have meaning! Every time that we say G-d died for our sins, what were really saying is:

G-d became man-so that He (G-d)-could offer Himself (G-d)-to Himself (G-d)-as a sin offering-so that He (G-d)-can forgive the sins-that we commit against Him (G-d)!

In other words, we sin and G-d punishes Himself. Talk about lack of personal accountability!

How did we go from total personal accountability as written in the original Old Testament as authored, in part, by G-d Himself, to G-d punishing Himself for our sins.When G-d spoke to Moses on the mountain, as witnessed by the entire Jewish nation, He gave Moses "The Law" which is based on total personal accountability, no where in G-d' actual spoken or written Law did G-d mention dying for our sins. To prove this when Moses came down from the mountain and the people had sinned and made an idol of gold, did G-d punish Himself or were thousands killed for their sins?

Yes, judging by our beliefs, words have meanings, unless they were spoken and written by G-d Himself!

How could Joseph,Mary's Husband, Have 2 Fathers?

How indeed! If the Bible is truly "Holy" and one can believe every word or statement written therein, then I'll ask once again: "How could Joseph have 2 fathers"? The "Holy Bible says:

Matthew 1: 16. And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus,

Luke 3: 23. And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli,

It does not take some kind of deep spiritual enlightenment to realize that Joseph could not of had two different fathers, either Jacob was his father or Heli was, the other is a lie.

I have heard that one part of Christianity claims that one of the family lines is that of Mary and the other is that of Joseph, this claim is absurd, The Jewish people never use the female when recording the family lines and beside this does not change the fact that the Holy Bible plainly states that Jacob begat Josheph-Joseph was the son of Heli. Again, I ask, should we or can we believe, every word written in the Bible?

The Great White Throne Judgement!

If G-d died for our sins? Why do we have to face the "white throne judgement"? Did G-D die for our sins or not? If we still have to face the "white throne Judgement" then at best,G-d forgiveness is only temporary! Which means it is useless! Now, don't get mad at me I'm only quoting the holy Bible.